📊 Donor Strategy
Donors balance between rewarding vulnerability (Donor V) and rewarding institutional capacity (Donor C), shaping who gets aid post-NAP.
By Pierre Beaucoral, Michaël Goujon, and Sébastien Marchand
“No Plan, No Aid?” examines whether implementing a National Adaptation Plan (NAP) increases a country’s climate adaptation finance. Through a novel theoretical model and a robust Double Machine Learning (DML) approach, the authors find that NAP adoption does send mixed signals—reducing perceived vulnerability while boosting perceived capacity. Crucially, they find that while traditional econometric models show no impact or even a negative one, modern methods reveal a significant positive effect on adaptation aid.
The paper builds a game-theoretic model contrasting two donor types: Donor V (vulnerability-focused) and Donor C (capacity-focused). Countries signal institutional capacity by adopting a NAP, but may lose aid from Donor V as they appear “less needy.”
Empirically, authors apply OLS, 2SLS (using latitude as an instrument), and Double Machine Learning (DML) to a dataset of 2,100 observations across 2013–2023.
Results reveal a hidden effectiveness of NAPs—detectable only when robust methods correct for nonlinearity and omitted variables.